Describe The Differences Between Jefferson And Jacobs

666 Words2 Pages

Both Jefferson and Jacobs’ articles discussed slavery. However, the authors had different perspectives on the subject that Jefferson left out slaves’ suffering while Jacobs failed to include Jefferson’s vision for the black. Comparing the two sources, we can see that Jacob’s article offers an insight that blacks are not physically or intellectually inferior to the white race as Jefferson considered them to be. Due to the distinctive point of view of each authors, they both omit some information about slavery. Therefore, combining the two perspectives allows us to see what they fail to cover in their own article. In the Notes on the state of Virginia, Jefferson explained his belief that blacks are inferior to the white race, and they should remain as slaves or be removed from the United States. His main argument focused on the differences between the black and the white race. As he stated, “...wherther it proceeds from the colour of the blood, the colour of the bile, or from that of some other secretion, the difference is fixed in nature, and is as real as if its seat and cause were better known of us.”(Jefferson, 2) he implied that inferiority comes with the black race at birth, and it shall always be that way according to the rules of the nature. He used his inferiority theory to justify slavery saying that slavery …show more content…

While giving biological evidences to prove that black people are savages and less than the white, Jefferson never discuss how bad the condition for slaves really was. On the other hand, Jacobs’ article carefully described the harsh environment which slaves live in that Jacobs’ vulnerably and helplessness was constantly reminded by her master’s unreasonable commands. The only effective way of resistance and self-protection was avoiding conflicts with the master. Still, she had to endure master’s violent outbreak and being treated as

Open Document