Comparing The Storm And William Faulkner's A Rose For Emily

1444 Words3 Pages

In zoology, students are taught that the some of the most successful organisms are eusocial, or truly social, ones. This means that those organisms are dependent on each other to work together to promote the success of the colony. This behavior, however, is not observed in humans. In fact, the human race has shown a tendency to turn against others in an effort to get ahead themselves. Furthermore, humans, consciously or not, create their own groups to attempt to better their well-being as this is the best way to survive. These are known as societies. Merriam Webster’s dictionary defines society as “An organized group working together or periodically meeting because of common interests, beliefs, or profession”. (Webster) Using this information, we can assume that an individual who is a part of a society in which they do not share common values, that individual may begin to reject their society, or the society may also reject them. Kate Chopin’s The Storm and William Faulkner’s A Rose for Emily display two different aspects of how an individual can reject society …show more content…

It can be observed that Emily, the protagonist of the story, never truly held herself to the same standards as her community. Also, that her community only tolerated her behavior because of who her father was to the town. (FAulkner) In the case of A Rose for Emily, the society rejects the individual, and even further isolates her a little more with every rebellious or questionable action she takes. In the story, Faulkner chooses to write Emily’s actions in a scattered way so that we don’t get the complete picture until the end of the story. This allows us to be able to see her in the way her town did. From Faulkner’s writing style, it can also be observed that the town isolated her and as a result of the isolation, rejected her from their

Open Document