Comparing The Great Gatsby And Nella Larsen's Passing

1668 Words4 Pages

Idealism, or Seeing Life Through Rose Coloured Blinders
Viewing the world through rose coloured glasses will undeniably allow one to believe that they can never fail, and that all the universe exists solely to actualize their hopes and dreams -- but at what price? While idealism is among the most powerful of driving forces towards progress and innovation on earth, it can often lead one to forget to assess whether or not their dreams are safe, or even practical. Nella Larsen and F. Scott Fitzgerald in their novels “Passing” and “The Great Gatsby”, both explore great tragedies caused by main characters having their heads too far into a dream to understand that their lifestyles are neither realistic nor safe. Characters in both novels are living …show more content…

Hence is the subject matter of Nella Larsen’s “Passing”. In the short yet entirely poignant novel, protagonist Irene Redfield finds herself encircled in the ring of deceit and idealistic views belonging to Clare Kendry. Clare is a woman who has decided to “pass” as a means of achieving a life more luxurious than that of a black woman in her society. This choice is risky alone, paired with superficial reasoning, makes for a potentially volatile situation if not handled with delicate precaution and constant awareness. Clare is, however, a frivolous and self destructive character who we see throughout the novel as being someone who does not give a second thought towards the trace she leaves on the world so much as she gets what she wants. In a conversation about having children, Clare speaks about how she “nearly died of terror the whole nine months before [her daughter,] Margery was born for fear that she might be dark. Thank goodness, she turned out alright” (Larsen 27). In this scene, Irene, Clare and Gertrude, a childhood friend of theirs, are talking about the fact that there is no predicting how dark or light a black child’s skin may be upon birth; meaning that the risk of her secret being revealed was made dangerously precarious as a result of her recklessness. The danger she has put herself in but has willingly chosen to …show more content…

Following a particularly emotionally strenuous encounter between he and Gatsby, Tom recommends that the whole group (Gatsby, himself, Nick Carraway, Daisy and Jordan Baker), head downtown, but insists that the two men swap cars. Daisy and Gatsby, who have unknowingly been suspected of their affair by Tom take off and, drunkenly, run over a woman who has run out into the street. Daisy’s hands were on the wheel. When the husband of the deceased woman inquires what really happened to Tom, as she was killed with his car. Tom blames Gatsby, and why should he not? As far as Tom knew, Gatsby was a frivolous, careless and untrustworthy man-- and all of this as a result of Gatsby’s own actions. Gatsby lives a gaudy and attention-seeking life solely for the recognition of one woman, he blatantly lies about his past and does not believe that he will be caught, and made passes at Tom’s wife right in front of him. A mix of retribution and mistaken identity take George Wilson, the woman’s wife, to Gatsby’s home, where he patiently awaits a phone call from Daisy-- presumably professing her love for him or something of the like-- that will never come. Gatsby is shot by Wilson, believing until the very end that his forbidden fruit was not lethal, and that he possessed the innate right to all of his greatest desires. It is remarked by Nick that Gatsby “paid a high price for living too long with a single dream” (Fitzgerald 163);

Open Document